Im going to leave it here. 100% of the time lowered ride height is for cosmetic purposes if the car doesn't have a
proper designed front splitter (this is very important, because flexi materials like Aluminite won't generate as much df as plywood etc).
Mathematically speaking a 1 inch lowered GRZ transfers 45lbs less weight when pulling 1 lateral G. This is literally inconsequential to the total load (weight) transfer. I would go as far as saying you only start noticing the difference when the car is 2" lowered (90lbs less load transfer). But at this point the car's suspension geometries are absolutely outta whack. Because any lateral load transfer will cause maximum binding from the suspension links/rubber bushings. If you want the car to transfer 90lbs less, just reduce that weight from the chassis. It's going to be expensive, but we wont have as much of a headache with dealing with suspension geometries.
The only performance advantage from lowering is lowering the roll centers. Lowered roll center (either ends) will cause less jacking on that end. But we will have to pay a penalty for this, which is losing roll stiffness thus the car's camber control decreases.
So what did i mean by "tasteful and nice"
@Scargod ? Literally the car will look tasteful and nice as a stanced car. Oh btw, do you understand why I didn't bother to type out all the technical jargons and reasons? Because literally im wasting my breath.
But nah everytime you gotta force my hands. Because 🫵🏼 had to nit pick on my most face value statements; and even the most in depth statements, you couldn't wrap your head around them.